Sydney Brenner on the Genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Sydney Brenner decided on his lifelong scientific goals on one cold day in April 1953.Hewas a 26-year-old graduate student in Oxford at the time. “What I remember inOxford is being hungry all the time, and cold,” he told me. Crick and Watson had just built the double helix model, and Brenner and a few others took a road trip to Cambridge to see it before it was announced to the rest of the world. In the model, Brenner could foresee the future of biological research. “We could now find out how genes worked. On that day I knew exactly what I wanted to do” (Friedberg 2010). Over the next 12 years, Brenner, Crick, and many others plugged away at figuring out how DNA worked. Brenner and colleagues built some of the foundations of molecular biology’s central dogma with key experiments that revealed the existence of messenger RNA (Brenner et al. 1961), a triplet genetic code (Crick et al. 1961), and stop codons (Brenner et al. 1965). But as early as 1962, thenewfieldofmolecular biologywas getting crowded. To the founders, the endgame was in sight. “Most of molecular biology had become inevitable,” Brenner said (Wood 1988). Many of the early molecular biologists chose to unleash forward genetics on more complex problems— neurobiology and development—taking the risk that the gene-by-gene reductionist approach would be effective. George Streisinger started zebrafish forward genetics. Seymour Benzer bet on fruit flies. And Brenner started tinkering with a variety of organisms. Brenner presented his ideas for studying diverse organisms in a 1963 letter that also included a longer-term possibility: “I would like to tame a small metazoan organism to study development directly.” Brenner searched for an animal that could be grown easily in the lab, that had fewer neurons than a fruit fly, and was small enough to fit in the view of a transmission electron microscope—pursuing a vision that forward genetics, detailed neural anatomy, and development might be married in a single animal. Microscopic nematodes seemed just right. Ellsworth Dougherty inBerkeley and colleagues had already proposed the potential value of tiny nematodes to genetics research and had generated and analyzed a couple of mutants (Dougherty and Calhoun 1948; Nigon and Dougherty 1950; Fatt and Dougherty 1963). Brenner wrote to Dougherty in 1963 to ask for worms and advice, and he drafted a one-page proposal to the Medical Research Council that ended with the famously optimistic aim: “To start with we propose to identify every cell in the worm and trace lineages. We shall also investigate the constancy of development and study its control by looking for mutants.” Brenner’s Caenorhabditis elegans mutant screens began in 1967. The 1974 article in GENETICS reported the results of these efforts. Brenner began by laying out the big questions of “how genes might specify the complex structures found in higher organisms.”He detailed how to conduct genetic analysis on a self-fertilizing hermaphrodite that also has cross-fertilizing males, and he reported on hundreds of mutants—long worms, rolling worms, dumpy-looking worms, uncoordinatedworms, blisteredworms, andwormswhose headswere notched or bent. Complementation and mapping identified a whopping 96 loci on six linkage groups, matching the known Copyright © 2016 by the Genetics Society of America doi: 10.1534/genetics.116.194084 Image of Sydney Brenner courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Archives. Address for correspondence: 616 Fordham Hall Campus Box 3280, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280. E-mail: [email protected]